tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19296105.post4361119963656160432..comments2009-07-21T11:48:57.270-07:00Paul Hooverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12071698965914855472noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19296105.post-91098460197445472052009-07-21T11:12:40.904-07:002009-07-21T11:12:40.904-07:00Enjoyed the post Paul! <br /><br />Some thoughts on Mark&#39;s comment:<br /><br />Poetry as an art, and by design, is bound by words... That being said, I think there are some natural limitations to what is acceptable as poetry (words being the only prerequisite / requirement). <br /><br />Best, Anton<br />www.foesofprose.comFoesOfProsehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08490421488953251057noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19296105.post-28634190121162451912009-07-15T02:19:05.067-07:002009-07-15T02:19:05.067-07:00I like the ideas behind conceptualism. Just heard the Kenny Goldsmith interview on the Poetry Foundation podcast, it was interesting what he was saying about how far poetry is behind the rest of the art world with regards to avant garde, especially in taking the ordinary and expressing it &#39;Duchamp&#39; like. I used the CIA statistics for world population in a poem about individualism.Mark William Jacksonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16271488109948329458noreply@blogger.com